<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SMO and Index Fragmentation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dbaduck.com/smo-and-index-fragmentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dbaduck.com/smo-and-index-fragmentation/</link>
	<description>DBA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 18:49:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Automating Index Fragmentation Reports - Hey, Scripting Guy! Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs		</title>
		<link>https://www.dbaduck.com/smo-and-index-fragmentation/#comment-30</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Automating Index Fragmentation Reports - Hey, Scripting Guy! Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benmiller.net/?p=55#comment-30</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I am not using SMO to retrieve the index fragmentation information. SMO has a known bug and I want to keep my code as simple as I can&#8212;not doing tons of conditions to check what version of SQL Server is to use SMO. For more information, see SMO and Index Fragmentation. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I am not using SMO to retrieve the index fragmentation information. SMO has a known bug and I want to keep my code as simple as I can&mdash;not doing tons of conditions to check what version of SQL Server is to use SMO. For more information, see SMO and Index Fragmentation. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
